← All frameworks

Awareness

Training trauma risk scorecard

Identify and reduce the emotional and cognitive risks in security and compliance training. Assesses where content, tone, or delivery might unintentionally trigger anxiety, shame or exclusion — particularly for neurodivergent or trauma-affected learners.

Who it's for

Anyone designing or commissioning mandatory training — security, compliance, safeguarding, HR. Especially if your audience includes neurodivergent staff, survivors of workplace incidents, or people with mental health conditions.

When to use it

Before signing off any new training module. After any complaint about training content. As part of any vendor evaluation for off-the-shelf courses.

Why this matters

Mandatory training reaches every person in your organisation. If the content uses fear, shame, or graphic scenarios without warning, you are not just being ineffective — you are causing harm to a measurable percentage of your workforce. The scorecard helps you spot it before you ship it.

What the scorecard checks

  • Use of fear-based imagery or language without purpose.
  • Graphic scenarios (violence, harassment, bereavement) without content warnings or opt-outs.
  • Tone that blames the learner for being a target.
  • Cognitive load — pace, length, complexity.
  • Availability of alternatives for those who can't safely engage with the original.

In practice

How to run it

  1. 1

    Score every new module against the scorecard before sign-off.

  2. 2

    Flag any high-risk items and require a documented mitigation.

  3. 3

    Provide a low-impact alternative path for any module that can't be made fully safe.

  4. 4

    Track complaints and opt-outs over time. They are signal, not nuisance.

Want the full story?

The frameworks are most powerful alongside the case studies, research, and playbooks in the book.

Buy Access Denied →